Just when I thought I knew all there was to know about mediation, I learned something new. I know that mediation, the process of resolving legal issues with the assistance of someone trained to help warring parties find creative solutions, is often better for divorcing spouses than having a trial. I have served as a mediator in numerous custody cases. As a Family Law practitioner, I have attended dozens of mediations while representing clients. As a Guardian Ad Litem for children, I’ve sat through mediations between the parents in case I could be of assistance with child-related issues. And as an adjunct Family Law professor, I have taught the mechanics and benefits of mediation to law students for seventeen years. I’ve even written articles about it, such as Take the Bat Out of the Battle, extolling its virtues for parties going through divorce.
I was in court to collect money that had been owed to me for a year and a half because I didn’t see the situation changing on its own any time soon. When the judge called our case, he asked us if we would like to mediate the case before having him hear it. I mentally rolled my eyes (it’s not good to actually roll your eyes when the judge asks a question) and asked myself what would be the point. I had already made two previous agreements with the individual over the past two years, and neither one had been honored. Besides – I was right. She had absolutely no defense. This was a slam-dunk case. I could be out of there in five minutes if it went to the judge. Who knew how long it would take if we tried to mediate it. As in, try to make another agreement with somebody I no longer trusted.
I looked over at my opponent and she shrugged – not quite sure what mediation was all about. The judge made the decision for me, suggesting that we give it a try. Not following the judge’s “suggestion” is about as well-received as eye-rolling. So off we trotted with a mediator who was standing by. The judge was already dealing with his next case.
My opponent and I sat across from each other at a conference table and the mediator sat at the head, forming a triangle with us. He started patiently explaining what mediation was, how it worked, and what was expected of us. I was still in professional attorney mode – and quite annoyed that I had to sit through a talk that I had given myself numerous times. I resisted the urge to “help” move things along.
And then we each had an opportunity to sum up our positions. To my shock and horror, I started getting a little emotional. What the . . . ? Attorneys don’t get misty-eyed when they talk. It just isn’t . . . done. I realized that it was less attorney-opponent and more two people who didn’t agree. Sure, we had “exchanged positions” before – but always through brusk phone exchanges or carefully worded emails. Never sitting across a table while looking at each other. Nothing like seeing a wince, frown, surprise, hurt rolling across the face of somebody you’re talking or listening to for a new perspective. Hearing is more than just taking in sound – it’s processing the words, registering them.
Here are a few things I learned about mediation from my new perspective:
Everything I formerly advocated about the mediation process for divorcing couples still holds true: you craft a better solution for your family than some judge who doesn’t know you can; you can get creative with the resolution in a way that the judge cannot; you have some control over the outcome as opposed to tossing the dice with the judge’s orders, you have an opportunity to be heard by the other in a way that you might not get in the courtroom.
I’m not telling you that Mediation is magic dust. It’s not something you can sprinkle on years of hurt, mistrust, betrayal, anger, or other raw emotions to make all the bad stuff disappear. I am telling you it’s a way to start a conversation that can have a different ending than others you’ve had before. And I’m telling you it’s an opportunity to be heard and craft a resolution for your family, and about your stuff, that is personalized in a way a judge just can’t accomplish. I’m telling you this process does not have the tear-each-other-to-shreds result that a trial can have. And I’m telling you, most important of all, that you can leave the mediation room with dignity intact, a desire to work together better for the children, and a sense of satisfaction having crafted a solution you believe works for your situation.
I can’t offer any solace regarding how you might feel leaving the courtroom if you choose to go to trial – because that’s an unknown.
Take the Bat out of the Battle (with mediation)
Marriage: Troubled Waters or Sea Glass?
I can certainly appreciate your change in perspective having been a teacher and a parent exchanging moments with parents and teacher both directions. But the irony, is that I read your article because I thought it said, The Me in Meditation. Since I”d been practicing meditation lately and struggling with some issues I jumped on your article. When I finished it, I reflected on your situation and thought about how we learn best in life–through experience. Ha Ha, My mind and eyes don’t always see or read the same things. Glad I read your story.
Thanks, Letty! You’re not the only one who saw “meditation” – almost every time I googled “mediation” with another word as I prepared articles, I’d get the “do you mean meditation?” message – a topic I’m definitely not qualified to write about! What a difference inverting two letters can make!
Shel this is a wonderful post, we never, ever stop learning do we and thats the beauty of this life. Thanks for keeping it real.
I’m with you, Kath – if the learning stops we get downright stagnant! Hope you have a great week!
My favorite reminder is that it’s not wise to roll your eyes at a judge. 🙂
As usual, though, the entire article is excellent, Shel.
Thanks, Marylin! I have seen more than one attorney humbled by a dressing down in open court because of such gestures. Who knew controlling one’s eyes could take such a mighty effort??
[…] inflict. Having described the process and it’s benefits in previous articles, including why my perspective changed after participating in a mediation as a party, I thought I’d pass on some tips from an […]
Ha ha…you’re right, Shel, eyeball rolling directed toward the judge is never a good idea. 🙂
I saw some pretty great results with mediation back in my day. Great post!
Thanks, Jill! I think even when parties walk away with exactly what a judge MAY have ordered, it still is more palatable to have participated in the outcome. However, I still fight mandated mediation in my county (it’s mandatory in some surrounding counties) because I think it can be a time and money waster if someone is coming into because they were court-ordered and are determined to sabotage the effort. Not that it doesn’t sometimes work even under those circumstances, but I think people’s resources need to be factored into the equation.
Brilliant – and so true!! Kudos to you Shel. I love that you share you can still learn something about your own well known professional role 🙂 Isn’t this true of life, every day? You are an inspiration!
Thanks, Pauline. Some lessons are foisted upon us and some we seek out, but the learning just never ends – thank goodness! Wouldn’t it be a dull place otherwise??
Once again, you have given some great advice! You know just the right thing to say and how to say it. You are very gifted, Shel!
Thanks, Ashely. We may have opportunity to revisit this topic!
Very good read and great advice. Very encouraging! Makes my heart happy 🙂
Seeing you were one of the first to read this post, and that you took the time to comment, absolutely made my day, Jessica!It’s easy to write good pieces when one has good people like you for inspiration!